Switchable DNA nanostructures for Energy and Data Storage

Published in Blog, science


The Brookhaven team, has been refin­ing tech­niques to use strands of arti­fi­cial DNA as a highly spe­cific kind of Vel­cro or glue to link up nanopar­ti­cles. Such DNA-based self-assembly holds promise for the ratio­nal design of a range of new mate­ri­als for appli­ca­tions in mol­e­c­u­lar sep­a­ra­tion, elec­tron­ics, energy con­ver­sion, and other fields. But none of these struc­tures has had the abil­ity to change in a pro­gram­ma­ble man­ner in response to mol­e­c­u­lar stim­uli — until now. “Now we’re using a spe­cial type of DNA-linking device — a kind of ‘smart glue’ — that affects how the par­ti­cles con­nect to make struc­tures that are switch­able between dif­fer­ent con­fig­u­ra­tions,” says Oleg Gang a team lead. This reli­able, reversible switch­ing could be used to reg­u­late func­tional prop­er­ties — for exam­ple, a material’s flu­o­res­cence and energy trans­fer prop­er­ties — to make new mate­ri­als that are respon­sive to chang­ing con­di­tions, or to alter their func­tions on demand.

A 3-D crystal from nanoparticlesa) Ide­al­ized schematic illus­trat­ing the struc­ture of the device (ld) link­age, with A’, D’ and B’ recog­ni­tion sequences. b) A bcc unit cell rep­re­sen­ta­tion of a bulk three-dimensional super­lat­tice con­sist­ing of nanopar­ti­cles A – p and B – p inter­con­nected by ld. © Nature Pub­lish­ing Group.

Such respon­sive­ness to changes in envi­ron­men­tal con­di­tions and the abil­ity to adopt new forms are hall­marks of liv­ing sys­tems. In that way, these new nano­ma­te­ri­als more closely mimic bio­log­i­cal sys­tems than any pre­vi­ous nanos­truc­tures. Though far from any form of truly “arti­fi­cial life,” these mate­ri­als could lead to the design of nanoscale machines that, at a very sim­ple level, mimic cel­lu­lar processes such as con­vert­ing sun­light into use­ful energy, or sens­ing the pres­ence of other mol­e­cules. Respon­sive mate­ri­als would also have ben­e­fits in the field of optics or to pro­duce reg­u­lated porous mate­ri­als for mol­e­c­u­lar sep­a­ra­tions, Gang says. The sci­en­tists achieved the goal of respon­sive­ness by cre­at­ing struc­tures where the dis­tance between nanopar­ti­cles could be care­fully con­trolled with nanome­ter accuracy.

Nanoscale com­po­nents can be self-assembled into sta­tic three-dimensional struc­tures arrays and clus­ters using bio­mol­e­c­u­lar motifs. The struc­tural plas­tic­ity of bio­mol­e­cules and the reversibil­ity of their inter­ac­tions can also be used to make nanos­truc­tures that are dynamic, recon­fig­urable and respon­sive. DNA has emerged as an ideal bio­mol­e­c­u­lar motif for mak­ing such nanos­truc­tures, partly because its ver­sa­tile mor­phol­ogy per­mits in situ con­for­ma­tional changes using mol­e­c­u­lar stim­uli. This has allowed DNA nanos­truc­tures to exhibit recon­fig­urable topolo­gies and mechan­i­cal move­ment. Recently, researchers have begun to trans­late this approach to nanopar­ti­cle inter­faces where, for exam­ple, the dis­tances between nanopar­ti­cles can be mod­u­lated, result­ing in a distance-dependent plas­monic response. Here, we report the assem­bly of nanopar­ti­cles into three-dimensional super­lat­tices and dimer clus­ters, using a recon­fig­urable DNA device that acts as an inter­par­ti­cle link­age. The inter­par­ti­cle dis­tances in the super­lat­tices and clus­ters can be mod­i­fied, while pre­serv­ing struc­tural integrity, by adding mol­e­c­u­lar stim­uli (sim­ple DNA strands) after the self-assembly processes has been com­pleted. Both sys­tems were found to switch between two dis­tinct rigid states, but a tran­si­tion to a flex­i­ble device con­fig­u­ra­tion within a super­lat­tice showed a sig­nif­i­cant hysteresis.

The pre­sented approach may poten­tially offer the post-assembly reg­u­la­tion of sys­tems with use­ful opto­elec­tronic, energy con­ver­sion and bio-diagnostic prop­er­ties. In addi­tion, the abil­ity to manip­u­late a nanos­truc­ture global sys­tem state opens new oppor­tu­ni­ties for the for­ma­tion of dynam­i­cally self-assembled struc­tures that more closely mimic bio­log­i­cal systems.

Maye, M., Kumara, M., Nyky­panchuk, D., Sher­man, W., & Gang, O. (2009). Switch­ing binary states of nanopar­ti­cle super­lat­tices and dimer clus­ters by DNA strands Nature Nan­otech­nol­ogy DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2009.378

22nd December, 2009

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.